ضَرَبَ ٱللَّهُ مَثَلًا عَبۡدًا مَّمۡلُوكًا لَّا يَقۡدِرُ عَلَىٰ شَىۡءٍ وَمَن رَّزَقۡنَٰهُ مِنَّا رِزۡقًا حَسَنًا فَهُوَ يُنفِقُ مِنۡهُ سِرًّا وَجَهۡرًا ۖ هَلۡ يَسۡتَوُۥنَ ۚ ٱلۡحَمۡدُ لِلَّهِ ۚ بَلۡ أَكۡثَرُهُمۡ لَا يَعۡلَمُونَ
Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah. But most of them understand not.<br/>
God strikes a similitude (mathalan, this is substituted by [the following, 'abdan mamlookan]) a slave who is a chattel (mamlookan, an adjective to distinguish him [this type of slave] from a free man, who is the servant of God [alone]) having no power over anything, since he has no mastery, and one on whom (man, is an indefinite [noun], adjectivally qualified, in other words, a free man) We have bestowed a fair provision from Us, such that he spends thereof secretly and openly, that is, disposing of it as he wishes: the first similitude is for the idols, while the second is His, exalted be He. Are they equal?, the powerless slaves and the dispensing free men? No. Praise belongs to God, alone. But most of them, that is, the people of Mecca, do not know, the chastisement they will come to, and so they associate others with God.